Warning: mysql_get_server_info(): No such file or directory in /home/jbj/jbj.wordherders.net/wp-content/plugins/simple-tagging-plugin/simpletagging.php on line 299

Warning: mysql_get_server_info(): A link to the server could not be established in /home/jbj/jbj.wordherders.net/wp-content/plugins/simple-tagging-plugin/simpletagging.php on line 299

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/jbj/jbj.wordherders.net/wp-content/plugins/simple-tagging-plugin/simpletagging.php:299) in /home/jbj/jbj.wordherders.net/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Dickens – The Salt-Box http://www.jbj.wordherders.net "A man needn't go far to find a subject, if he's ready with his salt-box."--Uncle Pumblechook Thu, 09 May 2013 17:06:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.1 Modernists think they’re so great http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2009/03/02/modernists-think-theyre-so-great/ http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2009/03/02/modernists-think-theyre-so-great/#comments Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:23:14 +0000 http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2009/03/02/modernists-think-theyre-so-great/ Continue reading ]]> The 2nd-most irritating thing* about being a Victorianist is having to deal with our modernist colleagues who appear to believe that modernist claims about Victorian culture were simply true, and not at all artifacts of generational conflict or artistic brand-building.   I’m happy to admit that, say, James Joyce or Virginia Woolf could write a hell of a sentence, and that the kind of psychological realism they could achieve is incredibly valuable.

But that doesn’t make claims like this–found in The Cambridge Companion to the Modernist Novel–any truer:

For Portrait announces from its first page Joyce’s radical break with the conventions of the ninteenth-century realist novel.  There is no omniscient narrator here, who directs the reader’s response.  Instead the narrative focuses on a particular consciousness, and is articulated through the kind of language such a consciousness would use.  If we compare the passage with the opening lines of Charles Dickens’s Great Expectations (1861), another novel concerning a young man’s coming of age, the difference is striking.  Great Expectations begins: “My father’s family name being Pirrip, and my Christian name Philip, my infant tongue could make of both names nothing longer or more explicit than Pip.”  The sentence immediately announces that this is not the voice of a child; the grammatical complexity of the opening clause, the use of the distinctively adult words “infant tongue” and “explicit,” tell us that the narrator is an older man looking back at his childhood, not a child telling his own story.  In contrast, Joyce’s use of simple words, baby-talk, and childish diction erases this overseeing, distancing narrative presence from the text, leaving us in intimate relation to Stephen’s consciousness alone.

Joyce was not the first writer to move from omniscient narration to a narrative style shaped by the interior life of his character . . . .  (102-03)

Is there any way of construing this paragraph that doesn’t imply, first, that Great Expectations is a realist novel, and second, that it has an omniscient narrator?  And does anyone who actually teaches this novel agree with either implication?

Of course it’s true that the opening page of Portrait seems more like a child’s perspective than Great Expectations‘s does. (Although is that a Dante allusion I see near the end of that page? My five year old’s read the Iliad and the Odyssey, both more than once, but I’m not sure I’ve ever heard him quote them.)

But it simply cannot be true that the point of the adult narrator’s recollection in this novel is oversight and distance, any more than it is in, say, Jane Eyre or Villette . . . or even David Copperfield.  Victorian literary culture was capable of playing complex games with self-presentation, as the dramatic monologue ought to make clear, and these and other first-person novels probably deserve to be read with some care.  In *none* of these novels does the narrator act like an omniscient one–instead, fictional autobiographies tend formally to point up the limits of one’s insight into one’s own life.

Great Expectations is a novel of adulthood, written from someone who is trying to make sense of his life, and trying desperately to convince us that things will work out for the best.  He returns to his past, neither because he is distanced from it nor to demonstrate his mastery of it, but precisely because he is not distanced at all, not a master at all.  That’s the rush of the book–and it’s a rush that most fictional auobiographies deliver in spades.

*The most irritating thing is having, every single semester, to explain, “Yes, we’re going to read the whole book.  I know it’s 1000 pages.”

http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2009/03/02/modernists-think-theyre-so-great/feed/ 11
Another Dickens adaptation http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/08/12/another-dickens-adaptation/ http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/08/12/another-dickens-adaptation/#comments Mon, 13 Aug 2007 03:27:05 +0000 adaptationscharles dickensclassicsdickensmoviesoliver twinkoliver twistpornography http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/08/12/another-dickens-adaptation/ Continue reading ]]> Fleshbot is reporting a new film version of Charles Dickens’s Oliver Twist:

In case you were wondering: yes, “Oliver Twinks” is the homo porno version of Charles Dickens’ classic novel, just in case that sad looking waif asking “Please, sir, I want some more” on the promo notice didn’t tip you off already. The movie is the latest release from PZP Productions, the twinks-gone-wild studio who also bought you “BeTwinked”, “Desperate Houseboys” and “The DaVinci Load” . . .

They’ve also got “plot” details and a link to the trailer. (I’d assume this is NSFW.)

(See also: A month ago I wrote about the upcoming Zemeckis/Carrey version of Dickens’s A Christmas Carol. Frankly, Oliver Twink sounds more appealing.)

Update:  Via Ed, word of a non-pornographic, (presumably) non-animated Old Curiosity Shop.

http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/08/12/another-dickens-adaptation/feed/ 1
Weird things that are sort of Victorian http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/24/weird-things-that-are-sort-of-victorian/ http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/24/weird-things-that-are-sort-of-victorian/#comments Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:14:14 +0000 booksculturedickensgalvanisminternetliteraturerandomslappingVictorian http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/24/weird-things-that-are-sort-of-victorian/ Continue reading ]]> These three things are all related to Victorian literature and culture, and are very, very strange.

Finally, this has nothing to do with Victorian literature, but: I forgot to post a link to last week’s post at Bookslut.

http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/24/weird-things-that-are-sort-of-victorian/feed/ 2
Robert Zemeckis hates Christmas: or, Leave Dickens alone! http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/07/robert-zemeckis-hates-christmas-or-leave-dickens-alone/ http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/07/robert-zemeckis-hates-christmas-or-leave-dickens-alone/#respond Sat, 07 Jul 2007 17:46:08 +0000 a christmas caroladaptationsbad ideascharles dickenschristmasjim carreymoviesrobert zemeckis http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/07/robert-zemeckis-hates-christmas-or-leave-dickens-alone/ Continue reading ]]> This is probably what Hopkins meant when he wrote “no worst, there is none.”

From the BBC:


Actor Jim Carrey is to play Ebenezer Scrooge and the ghosts of Christmas past, present and future


a Walt Disney remake of A Christmas Carol


The film will be directed by Oscar-winner Robert Zemeckis


Zemeckis . . . will be using a style of computer graphics known as “performance capture”.
This technology was used in his festive tale The Polar Express three years ago

Note that they don’t say “used successfully.”

Bah, humbug!

http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/07/07/robert-zemeckis-hates-christmas-or-leave-dickens-alone/feed/ 0
Dickens on executive privilege http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/06/20/dickens-on-executive-privilege/ http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/06/20/dickens-on-executive-privilege/#respond Wed, 20 Jun 2007 12:47:07 +0000 Dickensexecutive privilegesatire http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/06/20/dickens-on-executive-privilege/ Continue reading ]]> Good to see some things never change.  This from Dickens’s short sketch, “The Election for the Beadle.”  The captain and the overseer lead opposing factions in the local parish; the overseer represents the vested interests, the captain instinctively opposes them:

Then the captain . . . boldly expressed his total want of confidence in the existing authorities, and moved for ‘a copy of the recipe by which the paupers’  soup was prepared, together with any documents relating thereto. ‘  This the overseer steadily resisted; he fortified himself by precedent, appealed to the established usage, and declined to produce the papers, on the ground of the injury that would be done to the public service, if documents of a strictly private nature, passing between the master of the workhouse and the cook, were to be thus dragged to light on the motion of any individual member of the vestry.

http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/06/20/dickens-on-executive-privilege/feed/ 0