<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About offensiveness</title>
	<link>http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/09/28/about-offensiveness/</link>
	<description>"A man needn't go far to find a subject, if he's ready with his salt-box."--Uncle Pumblechook</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 21:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: jbj</title>
		<link>http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/09/28/about-offensiveness/#comment-2503</link>
		<author>jbj</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/09/28/about-offensiveness/#comment-2503</guid>
		<description>I can see that.  Deliberate obfuscation probably drives up the level of *most* academic writing . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see that.  Deliberate obfuscation probably drives up the level of *most* academic writing . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/09/28/about-offensiveness/#comment-2452</link>
		<author>Tom</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.jbj.wordherders.net/2007/09/28/about-offensiveness/#comment-2452</guid>
		<description>This week the spam filter caught two replies to emails that I sent.  One was an out-of-office reply from a service engineer and the other was a scientist in Russia.  Both were flagged as spam.

BTW, I enjoyed your critique of using MS Word Flesch-Kincaid scores.  What I've found is that the grade level for most scientific journals is skewed by multisyllabic words and long descriptive sentences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week the spam filter caught two replies to emails that I sent.  One was an out-of-office reply from a service engineer and the other was a scientist in Russia.  Both were flagged as spam.</p>
<p>BTW, I enjoyed your critique of using MS Word Flesch-Kincaid scores.  What I&#8217;ve found is that the grade level for most scientific journals is skewed by multisyllabic words and long descriptive sentences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
